From a USA Today survey: who do you trust to fix health-care.
Doctors, 77%
Hospitals, 64%
University professors or researchers who study health care policy, , 61%
Obama, 49%
Democratic leaders in Congress, 37%
Republicans leaders in Congress, 32%
Pharmaceutical companies, 30%
Health insurance companies, 26%
Well I'm not so sure about doctors, less so hospitals, both play the escalation game with insurance companies. I would trust even less the legislators and would give 0% for Pharmaceutical and Insurance companies -- both major problems. A fix would require a Warren Buffet or Bill Gates --half morphed int an Alexander Haig -- at NIH and there is no such person.
My proposal, for what little it is worth: let the states tackle the problem utilizing their medical schools. You would have 50 different solutions. One or more of them would work. It's the scientific method for a solution to what basically amounts to a scientific problem -- that is, once you chase the clarion vulchers out of the system.
The tsunami of new bio-medical discoveries presently unfolding in research laboratories demands both an educational component and collegial management by leaders in medical science. (Translational Medicine)
(EMR) Electronic Medical Record, (DSS) Discussion Support Systems, Translational Medicine, Current Medical Information Terminology, the architecture of design largely ignores differential diagnosis and current medical information. A Tsunami of new biomedical knowledge changes half of what we know and overwhelms attempts at setting standards. We lack a dynamic current medical information database that is accessible to the clinician and that can quantitate diagnostic evidence based on outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment